Home / TEIGEN Answers

TEIGEN Answers

What is civic education?

Published

The term civic education has spread, but what schools actually do — and how far they go — varies widely. Here are the issues that most often trip people up at the start, organized from the practitioner's side.

Junior high and high school students gathered in the council chamber discussing policy

What is civic education?A primer for schools, and five common pitfalls

6 min read

Since the voting age was lowered to 18, civic education has been taken up by many schools.

What that means in practice, however, differs greatly from school to school. Some lessons explain how elections work, some let students experience mock voting, and some go all the way to drafting policy.

What people hesitate over at the start is how far it is acceptable to go. Go too far and neutrality becomes a worry; hold back too much and it ends as a check of factual knowledge.

This article sets out five issues that most often trip schools up when they begin.

Who this is for

  • Teachers taking on civic education for the first time
  • Those who tried mock voting and felt it did not land
  • Administrators unsure where to draw the line on political neutrality
  • Those who want to connect it to inquiry time or student council activities
  • Local government and board of education staff designing programs

Issue 1 | Do not stop at practising how to vote

Mock voting is easy to introduce and students respond well to it.

But if you isolate the vote itself, what students experience is only choosing from options already prepared for them.

What is hard in real politics is not choosing but creating the options, allocating limited resources, and explaining yourself to those who disagree.

DesignWhat students experienceWhat stays with them
ExplanatoryKnowledge of the systemUnderstanding of terms
Mock votingThe procedure of choosingThe feel of a polling place
Policy drafting and candidacyCreating, allocating, explainingA feel for decision-making
Connected to the real systemReaching actual policy-makingThe experience of having changed something

Article 137-2 of the Public Offices Election Act prohibits election campaigning by those under 18. Even resharing a candidate's post can fall within the restriction. Teenagers therefore reach the day they gain the vote having had almost no chance to practise taking part in politics, and become citizens with a ballot overnight.

That is precisely why preparing the experience of standing on the side that creates inside school matters.

A student at the podium making the case for a policy

Issue 2 | Secure neutrality through what you take up

Anxiety about handling politics is usually anxiety about bringing real political conflict into the classroom.

That can be resolved by separating what you take up.

  • Do not take positions on real parties, candidates or contested issues
  • Have students compare the policies they themselves drafted
  • The teacher holds no conclusion and asks only whether the reasoning holds

You can reproduce the structure of decision-making without importing real conflict.

TEIGEN JP itself neither supports nor opposes any particular party or candidate and does not steer anyone's vote. Our board agreed on this policy and we have Published it.

The detailed boundaries are set out in Political neutrality in schools: what a class can do and what it should avoid.

Issue 3 | With limited periods, decide first what to give up

Almost no school can secure enough class periods for civic education.

To make it work within the time you have, decide first what to give up rather than what to add.

PeriodsWhat to keepWhat to give up
1The moment of decision (comparison and vote)Drafting, speeches
Two periodsDrafting, and answering questionsElection bulletins, deliberation
Four periodsThe whole arc, from analysis to voteRevising policy afterwards

TEIGEN JP's outreach program for junior high and high schools runs 2 to 4 periods, 30,000–50,000 yen per session (plus travel and venue costs at actual expense). If only one period is available, we take it on as a talk rather than a lesson.

Designs for each amount of class time are covered in detail in Designing a mock election class: what to keep and what to go deeper on, in two periods versus four.

Issue 4 | Connect to time you already have

Without creating a new unit, schools already hold time that connects to civic education.

Restating the purpose of time you already have gets you there faster than carving out new time from nothing.

Issue 5 | Assess the process, not the conclusion

Trying to grade proposals on quality pushes assessment towards the subjective.

A decision-based design brings out criteria you can assess in the process itself.

  • Whose problem did they define the issue as?
  • Under the constraints, what did they give up?
  • How did they respond to opposing views?
  • Can they explain the proposals they did not choose?

All of these appear in the record along the way, not in the final presentation.

An example in practice

TEIGEN JP runs the Mock Ward Mayoral Election in co-creation with Adachi City Hall, the city council, the board of education and the election administration commission. Participants analyse local issues, draft policy, stand as candidates, produce election bulletins and speeches, deliberate with council members and other participants, then compare policies and vote.

The 2025 edition drew 30 junior high and high school students, with 11 city council members taking part.

Participants and the city council members who took part, gathered in the council chamber

The questions council members ask — where will the funding come from, how will you explain this to residents who object — are not in any reference material. Answering them is what changes a proposal.

As institutional design research, we publish the Adachi City Youth Council Proposal, a five-stage design for connecting the voices of 13 to 24 year-olds to policy-making.

Who

Enquiries from schools and boards of education are handled through Contact Us, and those from local governments and councils through Contact Us. It is fine to get in touch before you have decided whether or when to run it.

Entry points by role are collected in Enquiry Guide to Civic and Cleanup Education.

Frequently asked questions

What grade level is appropriate for civic education?
It is more practical to adjust the subject matter and the complexity of the decision than to fix a grade level. Even junior high students can compare policies once you give them constraints on target group and budget. High school students can go further, into funding sources and consensus building. Our civic education outreach is designed for junior high and high schools, while our cleanup education outreach is for elementary schools at any grade.
Our teachers are uneasy about handling political topics.
Most of that unease disappears if you do not take positions on real parties, candidates or contested issues. When students compare policies they themselves drafted, you can work on the structure of decision-making without importing real political conflict into the classroom. The teacher holds no conclusion and only asks whether the reasoning holds.
Is mock voting alone still worthwhile?
Yes. Experiencing the atmosphere of a polling place lowers the psychological barrier to voting for the first time. On its own, however, it remains an experience of choosing from options someone else prepared. Even with a single period, adding a moment where students compare proposals under constraints and settle on one by vote changes what stays with them.
Can we run this in-house without an outside organization?
Yes. This article and the related practical guides are published as material for designing the lesson in-house. What an outside partner adds is a voice that is neither teacher nor parent, plus materials, facilitation and ballot boxes brought on site. Even when you design it yourself, your local election administration commission may lend equipment or offer advice.